Proud Canadian Company

Bank of Canada Holds Rate at 2.25% Amid Oil Shock and Trade Fears

nesto verified

How is this page verified?

All nesto content is reviewed by licensed, commission-free mortgage experts certified in multiple provinces. They evaluate articles for factual accuracy, current rate data, and regulatory compliance before publication.

On this page

Bank of Canada Holds Rate at 2.25% as Oil Shock Complicates the Path Forward

The Bank of Canada kept its overnight policy rate unchanged at 2.25% this morning, extending the current pause as the Governing Council weighed a cooling domestic economy against a sudden and severe global energy shock. The prime rate remains at 4.45%, providing stability for adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) holders and variable-rate mortgage (VRM) holders at a moment when economic signals are pulling the Bank in two conflicting directions.

This was not a comfortable hold. Governor Tiff Macklem made clear the Bank is navigating a rare stagflationary scenario, where weakening domestic conditions would normally call for further rate cuts, yet a supply-driven energy shock risks pushing inflation well above the 3% upper boundary of the control range. For Canadians tracking mortgage rates, this decision locks in near-term certainty on variable borrowing costs while a volatile bond market continues to define what happens to fixed rates.

The Energy Shock That Changed the Calculus

The Bank of Canada’s decision to hold came in an environment shaped more by events in the Persian Gulf than on Bay Street. The outbreak of conflict in the Middle East triggered an effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting a critical artery for global oil supply and sending Brent crude prices climbing steeply above $100 USD per barrel.

The ripple effect was immediate and dramatic. Gasoline prices surged by a record 21.2% in a single month, driving headline CPI to 2.4% in March. That number looks alarming on the surface, but the Bank noted clearly that the surge is almost entirely a supply-side shock. Governing Council confirmed it would look through the immediate inflationary impact of the conflict, provided the energy price spike did not ignite persistent price growth across other goods and services.

The Governing Council will look through the war’s immediate impact on inflation, but if energy prices stay high, we will not let their effects broaden and become persistent inflation,

– Governor Tiff Macklem stated.

Beneath the headline figure, the picture of core inflation was actually encouraging. The preferred core measures eased to around 2%, with the median gauge at 2.3% and the trim measure falling to 2.2%. Three-month annualized core inflation ran at just 0.8%, the softest trajectory since late 2020. That underlying trend is what gave the Bank permission to hold rather than hike in response to the energy shock.

A Fragile Domestic Economy

The decision to hold also reflected a domestic economy that is considerably weaker than the headline would suggest. Canada’s GDP contracted by 0.6% in the fourth quarter of last year, dragged down by a large inventory drawdown. Early first-quarter data offered some stabilization, with GDP edging up 0.1% in January and tracking toward a 0.2% gain in February. That is hardly a robust rebound.

Labour Market Deterioration

The labour market reinforced the picture of a stalling economy. Canada lost 83,900 jobs in February, followed by a modest recovery of just 14,100 positions in March. The unemployment rate held at 6.7%, reflecting stalled population growth and subdued hiring intentions across trade-sensitive sectors. Beneath the headline, full-time employment has borne the brunt of the slowdown, and wage growth is failing to outpace cost-of-living pressures for many Canadian households.

This combination of a contracting economy and rising energy prices puts the Bank in the classic stagflationary bind.

But supply-side shocks can push the economy and inflation in opposite directions—toward a weaker economy and inflation above target. This presents difficult choices for central banks because tightening monetary policy to restrain inflation tends to weaken the economy further.

– Deputy Governor Sharon Kozicki captured the dilemma in March

Will the BoC Cut, Hike, or Hold Through 2026?

The path forward is genuinely unclear, as captured in our latest mortgage rates forecast. Markets are reflecting the same uncertainty. Bond traders have shifted from near-unanimous expectations of further cuts at the start of the year to a more balanced view that accounts for both directions. Overnight swap data shows markets assigning a 15% probability to a 25-basis-point hike by October 2026, with the remaining probability split between additional holds and a return to cutting in late 2026.

Three scenarios now define the outlook. A cut becomes likely if the Middle East conflict de-escalates, oil prices retreat below $80 USD per barrel, and core inflation continues running near 2%. In that scenario, the Bank could resume easing as early as the September meeting to support the weakening labour market and stalled GDP growth. A hike becomes the base case only if energy prices stay above $100 and spread to food, transport, and shelter costs, forcing the Bank to defend its inflation mandate, even at the cost of further economic pain. A continued hold remains the most probable near-term outcome, giving Governing Council time to assess whether the oil shock proves transitory or structural before committing to its next move.

For mortgage borrowers, the practical implication is that locking in a fixed rate today provides insurance against a hike, while a variable rate retains optionality if a cut materializes later in the year.

Bond Yields, the Canadian Dollar, and Your Mortgage

Global financial conditions tightened sharply in response to the Middle East conflict. Bond yields rose, equity markets declined, and credit spreads widened as investors sought safety and priced in higher inflation risk. Five-year Government of Canada bond yields surged by up to 0.50% since the outbreak of the conflict, exerting direct upward pressure on fixed mortgage rates.

Lenders responded by repricing their offerings. Five-year fixed rates shifted into the low-to-mid 4% range, reversing some of the relief borrowers had seen over the previous several months of the easing cycle. This movement occurred independently of the Bank of Canada’s policy rate, underscoring a dynamic that many borrowers misunderstand: the Bank controls variable borrowing costs through the prime rate, but fixed-rate mortgage pricing responds to the bond market.

The Canadian dollar held up better than many analysts expected. Trading just above 73 cents against the US dollar, the loonie drew support from strong foreign direct investment and pension inflows into Canada. Unpredictable US trade policy and the upcoming review of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) remain the most significant external risks clouding the outlook. Still, neither has materially destabilized the currency.

How the April Hold Affects Variable, Adjustable, and Fixed Mortgage Rates

Today’s policy rate hold leaves variable and adjustable mortgage payments completely unchanged. VRM holders continue to see the same monthly payment with the existing principal-to-interest split, while ARM holders keep the lower payment they locked in after the previous round of cuts. Fixed mortgage rates, however, have already moved higher independently of today’s decision. The 0.50% surge in 5-year Government of Canada bond yields since the Middle East conflict began has translated into roughly 30 to 40 basis points of upward pressure on 5-year fixed offers, with most lenders now quoting in the low-to-mid 4% range. Borrowers shopping for fixed should treat today’s rates as a ceiling that could rise further if oil prices stay elevated, not a floor that will ease in the coming weeks.

What Happened in Housing

The Canadian housing market entered the spring season with considerably less momentum than anticipated. The national benchmark home price slipped to $661,100, bringing it back to levels last seen in the spring of 2021. Home resales remained under pressure, with new listings declining 3.9% in February. The sales-to-new-listings ratio tightened, signalling softer market conditions as buyers remained cautious ahead of the all-important spring selling season.

Several dynamics are shaping demand. Consumer confidence dropped to an 11-month low as the war dragged on and gasoline prices soared. A significant majority of households anticipated the conflict would weaken the economy and raise prices, and many chose to delay major purchases in response. Motivated sellers have quietly become more willing to negotiate, and with lower competition in the market, buyers who are financially ready to move have genuine leverage.

Is This a Buyer’s Market?

For financially prepared buyers, today’s combination of stabilizing prices, low competition, and improved affordability creates one of the most favourable purchase windows of the past two years. The benchmark home price has retraced to spring 2021 levels, motivated sellers are negotiating, and consumer confidence remains low enough to keep sidelined buyers out of the bidding pool. Windows like this typically close quickly once sentiment shifts, whether triggered by a resolution to the Middle East conflict, a return to BoC rate cuts, or a stabilization in the trade outlook or labour market. Buyers who are mortgage-ready today have leverage that buyers in a recovering market will not.

Best Mortgage Rates

4.30% 3-year fixed
4.04% 5-year fixed
3.60% 3-year variable
3.40% 5-year variable

Check More Rates

How Affordability Shifted Across Canada

How Bank of Canada Rate Changes Affected Home Prices, Mortgage Qualification and Interest Costs Across Canada

Housing affordability in Canada evolves through three interrelated channels: home prices, mortgage qualification thresholds, and the ongoing cost of carrying a mortgage. Using benchmark composite home prices and nesto’s insurable pricing assumptions, the tables below show how affordability changed across Canada since last year. Each comparison compares April 2026 data with April 2025, providing a consistent lens on how monetary policy affects household balance sheets over time.

Housing Affordability: Year-Over-Year Changes in Home Prices

The first and most visible affordability constraint remained the price of housing itself. While national benchmarks often suggest home prices are stabilizing, price movements can vary materially by province, altering the upfront capital required to enter homeownership. In some provinces, benchmark home prices declined year over year, mechanically improving affordability. In other cases, home prices remained elevated or continued to rise, thereby reinforcing barriers to entry. However, price adjustments alone did not determine affordability outcomes, particularly where financing costs remained restrictive.

Home Prices
April 2026
Home Prices
April 2025
Year-over-Year $ Difference
Canada$664,400$696,900$32,500
BC$889,100$944,300$55,200
AB$509,200$527,600$18,400
SK$374,100$351,200-$22,900
MB$389,800$378,400-$11,400
ON$749,200$801,500$52,300
QC$549,400$519,300-$30,100
NB$329,400$314,900-$14,500
NS$437,200$422,000-$15,200
PE$377,000$366,600-$10,400
NL$334,000$305,600-$28,400
Benchmark home prices are CREA composite benchmark values. Comparisons reflect the same calendar month year over year. Year-over-year dollars represent nominal price changes. 

Mortgage Affordability: Income Required to Qualify for the Same Home

Home prices represented only one component of affordability. Mortgage affordability depended on qualifying income, prevailing interest rates, and lender underwriting standards. The table below shows how the required household income to be eligible for the same benchmark home changed year over year using a consistent qualification framework. In several provinces, required incomes changed unevenly compared to home prices, as borrowing costs offset price changes. This divergence explained why affordability metrics improved in theory while access to mortgage credit remained constrained in practice.

Qualifying Income
April 2026
Qualifying Income
April 2025
Year-over-Year $ Difference
Canada$125,139$123,683-$1,456
BC$150,234$148,286-$1,949
AB$92,840$91,724-$1,116
SK$74,971$74,151-$820
MB$78,488$77,634-$854
ON$145,713$144,071-$1,642
QC$99,926$98,722-$1,204
NB$68,492$67,770-$722
NS$90,125$89,166-$958
PE$78,042$77,216-$826
NL$65,038$64,306-$732
The above qualifying incomes apply to all home purchases and mortgage refinances and are based on stress-tested payments at the minimum qualifying rate (MQR). The MQR is defined as the greater of 5.25% (Benchmark rate) or your contract rate plus 2%. Required income estimates assume a 20% downpayment, 80% loan-to-value (LTV) ratio on nesto’s insurable mortgage pricing, and a 39% gross debt service (GDS) ratio, over a 25-year amortization. Calculations exclude mortgage default insurance premiums and assume consistent underwriting standards across periods. The above figures represent qualification thresholds rather than affordability recommendations.

Homeownership Affordability: Changes in Interest-Carrying Costs

Affordability pressures did not end at mortgage approval. Households ultimately faced the ongoing cost of servicing mortgage debt. The final comparison isolates the interest portion of mortgage payments to show how the cost of carrying a home evolved year over year. In most provinces, interest-carrying costs changed in proportion to interest rates. Even so, financing costs remained materially higher than before the tightening cycle, shaping renewal or refinancing options and limiting near-term payment relief for existing homeowners.

Interest-Carrying Costs
April 2026
Interest-Carrying Costs
April 2025
Year-over-Year $ Difference
Canada$101,225$100,860-$4,257
BC$135,460$136,665-$5,558
AB$77,580$76,358-$3,604
SK$56,996$50,828-$3,652
MB$59,388$54,764-$3,756
ON$114,145$115,998-$4,625
QC$83,704$75,156-$3,379
NB$50,186$45,574-$1,753
NS$66,610$61,075-$4,482
PE$57,438$53,057-$3,316
NL$50,887$44,228-$2,777
Interest-carrying costs reflect the annualized interest component of mortgage payments for an 80% loan-to-value (LTV) ratio on an insurable mortgage tied to benchmark composite prices. Calculations exclude principal repayment, property taxes, utilities, insurance, and maintenance. Figures illustrate financing cost pressure rather than the total cost of homeownership.

Why These Affordability Measures Matter for Monetary Policy

Viewed together, these three measures explain why affordability adjusted unevenly as broader economic conditions evolved over the last 12 months. Home prices moved unevenly, mortgage qualification remained highly sensitive to interest rates, and homeownership costs stayed elevated across much of the country. These dynamics reinforced the reality that monetary policy influenced affordability primarily through financing conditions rather than price correction alone, supporting a cautious, data-dependent policy stance over time.


*For illustrative purposes only, when comparing against nesto’s 5-year lowest fixed insurable mortgage rates, with a 20% downpayment & 25-year amortization, using Canada’s composite average home price data as made available through CREA. Other limiting terms & conditions apply. Rates are subject to change without notice.

Fixed vs Variable: Where Does the Rate Strategy Stand?

For borrowers assessing their options after today’s hold, the fixed vs variable mortgage decision has become more layered than at any point in this rate cycle. Here is how the landscape sits:

The prime rate remains at 4.45% with today’s decision, leaving discounts on ARM and VRM products intact. The best variable-rate options available in the market sit at 3.40%, roughly 60 basis points below the lowest fixed options. That spread has narrowed considerably from earlier in the easing cycle, when variable rates enjoyed a wider cost advantage.

Locking in a fixed rate today provides certainty against further energy-driven increases in bond yields. If crude prices stay elevated and the Bank is forced into a hawkish pivot later in 2026, fixed-rate holders are fully protected. Conversely, if the energy shock proves transitory and the Bank resumes cutting rates to support the weakening domestic economy, variable and adjustable mortgage holders would benefit from further relief without penalty.

The hybrid approach, splitting the mortgage balance between fixed and floating rates, offers a middle path for households that want to participate in potential downside rate movements without being fully exposed to the upside risk of energy-driven inflation.

Mortgage Strategy by Borrower Type

Homebuyers considering entering the market now face a favourable negotiating environment in most cities. Reduced competition, stabilizing home prices, and improved affordability relative to 2023 highs create a window that historically closes quickly once sentiment turns. Securing a mortgage pre-approval locks in rate certainty while buyers search, insulating them from further increases in bond yields.

Renewers with a 2026 term maturity are advised to begin the conversation well before their maturity date. The renewal wave remains enormous, with over a million mortgages expected to come due this year. Lenders are competing aggressively for retention, which creates leverage for borrowers who arrive at the conversation prepared. Using a mortgage payment calculator to quantify the monthly impact of each rate scenario is a practical first step.

Homeowners exploring refinancing face a more nuanced environment. While the prime rate remains steady and refinances are accessible, fixed-rate options have moved higher amid rising bond yields. Debt consolidation through a mortgage refinance still makes financial sense for households carrying high-interest consumer debt, but the timing and rate selection require careful analysis.

Should I Lock in a Fixed Rate After the April Hold?

For most borrowers, locking in a fixed rate today makes strategic sense if budget certainty is the priority. The 0.50% surge in bond yields has already pushed fixed offers higher, and the bond market is pricing further upside risk if oil prices stay elevated through the summer. The lowest 5-year fixed rates remain historically reasonable in the low-4% range, but the trajectory has clearly turned. Borrowers who prioritize the lowest possible borrowing cost over the full term, and who have the cash flow flexibility to absorb potential rate movement in either direction, may still find variable and adjustable rates the better mathematical choice given the spread to prime. The decision ultimately comes down to risk tolerance: a fixed rate offers peace of mind against an energy-driven hike scenario, while a floating rate preserves the opportunity to participate in any eventual return to easing.

Why a Steady Rate Doesn’t Mean Steady Mortgage Costs

The Bank of Canada’s hold at 2.25% delivers stability in name only. Governing Council chose to wait rather than act, buying time to determine whether the Middle East oil shock is temporary or structural before committing to its next move. The result for Canadian borrowers is a split outcome. Variable and adjustable mortgage payments are anchored to a prime rate that has not moved, while fixed mortgage rates are floating on a bond market that has already moved 0.50% higher since the conflict began. A held policy rate is not a held mortgage market.

The Bank’s next scheduled policy rate decision is set for June 10, but the accompanying April Monetary Policy Report provides updated projections for inflation, GDP, and the labour market. Borrowers can track the full schedule on the Bank of Canada interest rate schedule page, updated by nesto after each announcement.

Whether you are buying a home, approaching a mortgage renewal, or exploring a refinance to manage rising costs, understanding how Canada mortgage rates are moving in this environment is critical to protecting your budget. Contact nesto mortgage experts today for a personalized mortgage strategy built for this moment.

Why Choose nesto

At nesto, our commission-free mortgage experts, certified in multiple provinces, provide exceptional advice and service that exceeds industry standards. Our mortgage experts are salaried employees who provide impartial guidance on mortgage options tailored to your needs and are evaluated based on client satisfaction and the quality of their advice. nesto aims to transform the mortgage industry by providing honest advice and competitive rates through a 100% digital, transparent, and seamless process.

nesto is on a mission to offer a positive, empowering and transparent property financing experience – simplified from start to finish.

Contact our licensed and knowledgeable mortgage experts to find your best mortgage rate in Canada.

About the contributors

Written by

Samson Solomon

Mortgage Content Expert

Samson is a Mortgage Content Expert at nesto with over 25 years of experience in retail banking, financial advising and…

Reviewed by

Chase Belair

Co-Founder & Principal Broker